Creativity and Contemporary Schooling: A Critical Appraisal of Ken Robinson’s “Do Schools Kill Creativity?”
Abstract
The increasing demand for innovation, adaptability, and critical problem-solving in contemporary society has renewed attention to the capacity of formal education systems to nurture or constrain learners’ creative potential. This paper appraised Ken Robinson’s influential speech, “Do Schools Kill Creativity?”, with a view to examining the validity, relevance, and educational implications of its central arguments within present-day schooling. Specifically, the paper interrogated Robinson’s major claims concerning the suppressive tendencies of conventional school structures, evaluates the extent to which contemporary educational research supports or challenges his position on the relationship between schooling and creativity, and assesses the relevance of his critique to current educational practices and curriculum development. The paper was anchored on Howard Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences Theory, which provides conceptual support for Robinson’s rejection of narrow definitions of intelligence and his advocacy for broader recognition of diverse learner capacities. Adopting an analytical review (appraisal) method, the paper critically examined recent empirical studies, theoretical perspectives, and educational reform literature relevant to creativity and formal schooling. The paper revealed that Robinson’s critique remains substantially valid, particularly in contexts characterised by rigid curriculum structures, examination-driven instruction, and limited opportunities for interdisciplinary and creative engagement. However, evidence from curriculum reforms in countries such as Finland and Singapore demonstrates that schools can effectively foster creativity through intentional pedagogical redesign. The paper concluded that schools do not inherently suppress creativity; rather, creativity is diminished when educational systems prioritise conformity over intellectual exploration. It therefore recommended assessment reform, stronger integration of creativity-centred learning within curriculum frameworks, and sustained teacher development aimed at promoting innovative classroom practices.
References
Bolden, D. S., Harries, T., & Newton, D. P. (2023). Pre-service primary teachers’ conceptions of creativity in mathematics. Educational Studies, 49(2), 201–219.
Booth, A., Sutton, A., Clowes, M., & Martyn-St James, M. (2022). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Brandt, A. (2021). Defining creativity: A view from the arts. Creativity Research Journal, 33(2), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1855905
Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2021). Creative learning environments in education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100882.
Davis, K., Christodoulou, J., Seider, S., & Gardner, H. (2021). The theory of multiple intelligences. In R. J. Sternberg & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed., pp. 485–503). Cambridge University Press.
Fleming, M., Bresler, L., & O’Toole, J. (2024). Arts education and curriculum marginalisation in contemporary schooling. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 25(3), 1–22.
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2021). A typology of reviews: An analysis of review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 38(4), 328–334.
Gu, X., Ritter, S., Frossard, F., van den Boom, L., Delfmann, L. R., & Barajas, M. (2026). Fostering creativity in formal schooling: A systematic review of explicit and implicit interventions for young learners. Educational Research Review, 47, 100784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2026.100784
Harris, A., & de Bruin, L. (2022). Creativity in education: Examining the impact of standardised testing pressures. Educational Researcher, 51(4), 267–279.
Henriksen, D., Mishra, P., & Fisser, P. (2024). STEAM education and interdisciplinary creativity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(1), 113–136.
Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Shack, K. (2021). Mindsets, mistakes, and creative confidence in educational settings. Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(3), 647–661.
Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (2022). The Cambridge handbook of creativity (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Kim, H., & Choi, Y. (2023). Curriculum reform and creative capacity development in South Korean secondary education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24(2), 255–271.
Kong, S. C., Chiu, M. M., & Lai, M. (2024). Digital creativity in formal education: Effects of maker-centred learning. Computers & Education, 201, 104815.
Li, Y., & Harris, A. (2023). Student well-being and academic pressure in high-stakes educational systems: A comparative review. Educational Review, 75(4), 611–629.
Long, H., Kerr, B. A., Emler, T. E., & Birdnow, M. (2022). A critical review of assessments of creativity in education. Review of Educational Research, 46(1), 83–120. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X221084326
Marenus, M. W., Gresalfi, M., & Hutchins, N. M. (2022). Revisiting multiple intelligences in educational practice: Implications for inclusive pedagogy. Educational Review, 74(5), 691–708.
Mehta, J., & Fine, S. (2025). In search of deeper learning: The quest to remake the American high school (Updated ed.). Harvard University Press.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). PISA 2022 results: Creative minds, creative schools. OECD Publishing.
Rabkin, N., & Hedberg, E. C. (2024). Arts education access after COVID-19 school restructuring. Arts Education Policy Review, 125(1), 18–31.
Rawlings, B. S., & Cutting, S. J. (2024). Linking disparate strands: A critical review of the relationship between creativity and education. Educational Psychology Review, 36, Article 135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09973-z
Robinson, K., & Aronica, L. (2022). Creative schools: Revolutionizing education from the ground up (Updated ed.). Penguin Books.
Rockliffe, A., & McKay, J. (2023). Dualities in creative thinking: A novel approach to teaching and learning creativity. Research in Education, 116(1), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/00345237231158053
Sahlberg, P. (2021). Does Finnish schooling support creativity? Reflections on curriculum reform and pedagogical renewal. European Journal of Education, 56(3), 389–402.
Sánchez Milara, I., & Cortés Orduña, M. (2024). Possibilities and challenges of STEAM pedagogies. Education Sciences, 14(8), 842. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080842
Schleicher, A. (2023). World class: How to build a 21st-century school system. OECD Publishing.
Snyder, H. (2023). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines for analytical review. Journal of Business Research, 161, 113829.
Swanzy-Impraim, E. (2026). Creativity development in art education: A proposed framework. Discover Education, 5, Article 273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-01296-1
Tan, C., Koh, K., & Choy, B. H. (2022). Applied learning and creative capability development in Singapore schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(4), 701–717.
UNESCO. (2023). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education—Progress update 2023. UNESCO.
Visser, B. A., Ashton, M. C., & Vernon, P. A. (2021). Beyond g: Debates surrounding multiple intelligences in educational psychology. Intelligence, 87, 101548.
Winner, E., Goldstein, T. R., & Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2022). Art for art’s sake? The impact of arts education on creativity and innovation. OECD Publishing.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the IJO Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.
