Assessing the Adequacy of Formative Assessment Practices in Colleges of Education In South-western Nigeria: Implications for Quality Assurance
Abstract
Formative assessment practice is an important aspect of quality assurance in teacher education, but its sufficiency in Nigerian Colleges of Education has not been sufficiently studied. This research examined the practice of continuous assessment in the colleges of education in southwestern Nigeria through a systems theory framework and a concurrent explanatory mixed-method design. There were 445 second-year students, institutional administrators, and expert assessors. Tools: Assessment Quality Rubric (r = 0.83), Continuous Assessment Record Checklist, Interview and Focus Group Discussion Guides. Results showed that there were severe deficiencies: 100 per cent lack of assessment schedules in all institutions; 44.4% to 100% sufficiency in record-keeping; 50 per cent of periodic testing performance was rated as requiring improvement; nearly complete failure in the feedback provision, with students reporting never receiving continuous assessment scores until final results. These are key violations of NCCE standards. Such recommendations as the creation of standardised assessment schedules, systematic feedback protocols, digitisation of records, assessment literacy and compliance monitoring enhancement are offered. The paper provides empirical records of continuous assessment sufficiency, uses the systems theory to examine the assessment analysis, and draws the relationship between the insufficiency of assessment practice and the issues of teacher quality.
References
(Ed.), Assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 35-48). Routledge.
Crede, M., Roch, S. G., & Kieszczynka, U. M. (2010). Class attendance in college: A meta-
analytic review of the relationship of class attendance with grades and student characteristics. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 272-295.
Durosaro, D. O. (2002). Management of school records. In D. O. Durosaro & A. A. Ogunsaju
(Eds.), The craft of educational management. Ilorin: Haytee Press.
Easton, D. (1965). A framework for political analysis. Prentice-Hall.
Florez, M. T., & Sammons, P. (2013). Assessment for learning: Effects and impact. CfBT
Education Trust.
Gray, J. (2020). Assessment planning in higher education: A comprehensive guide. Routledge.
Hanna, G. S., & Dettmer, P. A. (2004). Assessment for effective teaching: Using context-
adaptive planning. Pearson.
Liberman, J., & Clarke, M. (2012). A review of formative assessment in K-12 settings. Journal
of Educational Measurement, 49(3), 336-356.
Mallilin, L. L. D. (2022). Systems thinking in educational assessment: A theoretical approach.
International Journal of Educational Research, 28(4), 567-582.
Manitoba Education, Citizenship and Youth. (2006). Rethinking classroom assessment with
purpose in mind. Manitoba Education.
Mendez, A., & Sarmiento, A. (2011). Continuous assessment in higher education: Best
practices and challenges. Higher Education Research, 45(2), 189-207.
Mwebaza, M. (2010). Continuous assessment and student performance in Ugandan
universities. African Journal of Teacher Education, 1(1), 78-95.
National Commission for Colleges of Education. (2012). Minimum standards for NCE
teachers. NCCE.
Ololube, N. P. (2013). Educational management, planning and supervision: Model for effective
implementation. Pearl Publishers.
Osakwe, R. N. (2011). Managing records in Nigerian schools: Problems and prospects.
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2), 109-114.
Patrick, S., & Uvietesivwi, A. (2018). Continuous assessment practices in Nigerian tertiary
institutions. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(12), 88-96.
Shukla, S. (2019). Continuous comprehensive evaluation in Indian education system.
Educational Quest, 10(1), 1-6.
von Bertalanffy, L. (1956). General system theory. General Systems, 1(1), 1-10.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the IJO Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.