EXPLORING CHAT GPT: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF PERFORMANCE, USER PERCEPTION, AND SATISFACTION
Abstract
This study delves into assessing Chat GPT's performance, user perception, and satisfaction before and after its widespread adoption in educational settings. Utilizing statistical methods such as Paired t-tests and ANOVA, data collected from October to December 2023 are analyzed to understand the changes and impact over time. Specifically, the study focuses on exploring user perspectives and satisfaction levels regarding Chat GPT's learning capabilities, aiming to discern any notable differences in learning-oriented interactions. The findings reveal a mixed impact of Chat GPT adoption, with improvements noted in information accessibility and self-directed learning experiences. However, challenges are observed in critical thinking stimulation and problem-solving skills. Interestingly, there is a decline in the stimulation of critical thinking and enhanced problem-solving skills post-adoption. Overall, the study highlights the complexities of integrating AI technologies like Chat GPT into educational environments, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of its potential benefits and limitations. By examining both performance metrics and user perceptions, this research contributes to a nuanced understanding of Chat GPT's effectiveness in facilitating learning experiences and provides insights for optimizing its utility in educational contexts.
References
3. Adams, G., & Nelson, H. (2022). Impact of AI on academic achievement. Academic Research and Trends, 59(1), 34-50.
4. .Marche, S. (2023). The elusive application of Chat GPT in essay writing. Atlantic Magazine, 30(4), 78-91.
5.Minz, S. (2023). Leveraging Chat GPT for educational support: A practical perspective. Inside Higher Ed, 25(2), 110-125.
6. .Lund, A., & Wang, C. (2023). Chat GPT: A sophisticated tool for text-based interactions. Journal of Educational Technology Research, 41(2), 180-195.
7. .Ferraina, M., & Sublessor, L. (2023). Impact of Chat GPT on student research outcomes: A mixed-methods analysis. Research in Higher Education, 48(6), 400-415.
8.Singh, H., & Singh, A. (2023). Understanding Chat GPT: A conversational language model. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Applications, 37(4), 220-235.
9..Macdonald, et al. (2023). Plagiarism concerns with Chat GPT: Addressing attribution in AI-generated content. Journal of Academic Ethics, 60(2), 150-165.
10.McKinsey & Company. (2023). Chat GPT: Popularity, implications, and uncertainties. AI Insights Review, 15(3), 210-225.
Copyright (c) 2024 IJO -International Journal of Business Management ( ISSN 2811-2504 )
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the IJO Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.