Abstract
A simple crown fracture refers to acrown fracture tooth without compromising the dental pulp. This type of dental trauma is common in the maxillary area. Depending on the extent
of the fracture, it may affect only the enamel structure or involve both the enamel
and the dentin, without exposing dental pulp. When located in the anterior region,
the crown fracture disfigures the facial aesthetic, the smilingand leads to psychosocial, aesthetic, and functional repercussions for the patient. The most commonetiology
is the patient'sfall or a collision during sports or daily activities. Generaly, noninvasive ther apeutic involves direct composite crown restoration or the option of reattaching
the fractured dental fragment. Invasive management tends toward prosthetic restoration. Nonconservative management leads to tooth extraction. The aim of this research was
to describe the the rapeutic decision-making process chosen by odontostomatologists practicing in Antananarivo when they faced with a case of simple coronal dental fracture. The results of the cross-sectional descriptive study highlighted the tendency to wards invasive the rapies.
References
2. Spinas E. A new classification for crown fractures of teeth. Journal of ClinicalPediatricDentistry. 2002 : 225-31.
3. Hecova H, Tzigkounakis V, Merglova V, Netolicky J. A retrospectivestudy of 889 injured permanent teeth. Dent Traumatol . 2010 : 466–75.
4. Bissinger R, Müller DD, Reymus M, KhazaeiY, Hickel R, Bücher K and all.Treatmentoutcomes after uncomplicated and complicated crown fractures in permanent teeth. Clinical Oral Investigation. Germany. 2020 : 1-11.
5. Atabek, D, Alaçam, A, Aydintu, Konako G. RetrospectiveStudy of Traumatic Dental Injuries. Dent.Traumatol. Turkey. 2014, 30, 154–61.
6. Smithson V. Management of uncomplicated crown fractures in the permanent dentition
7. .Clinical. International Dentistry – Africa. 2022 : 14-2.
8. Martos J, Pinto KVA, Miguelis TMF, Xavier CB. Management of an uncomplicated crown fracture by reattaching the fractured fragment—Case report. Dent Traumatol. Brazil. 2017;00:1–5.
9. Mamiarisoa JEF, Bela C, Mbima C. Impact de l’exode rurale sur le développement agricole à Madagascar. Revue Internationale de la Recherche Scientifique. France : 2024 : 2381.
10. Ordre National des Odonto-stomatologistes de Madagascar. Annuaire 2016. Madagascar :2016 : 33-4.
11. Ministère de la Santé publique de Madagascar. Annuaire des statistiques du secteur santé de Madagascar. Madagascar : 2013 : 1-50.
12. Rakotoarivony AE, Rakotoarison RA, Rakotoarimanana FVD’A, Arijaona NA, Rakoto-Alson S, Rakoto FA.Épidémiologie des traumatismes dento-maxillo-faciaux au CENHOSOA Antananarivo.Med Buccale Chir Buccale. France.2014 : 20 : 221-26.
13. Arciprete C, Leander SS. Analyse de l’avantage urbain à Madagascar. UNICEF pour chaque enfant. Italy : 2023 :8.
14. Magne P, Belser U. Biomimeticrestorativedentistry. Fondamental and basic clinicalprocedure. Quitenssence. USA : 2022 : (1) : 1-3.
15. Gray L, McNeill L, Yi W, Zvonereva A, Brunton P, Mei L. The “business” of dentistry:Consumers’ (patients’) criteria in the selection and evaluation of dental services. PLoS ONE. Austria. 2021 : 16(8): 1-2.
16. Rafalimino HN, Ratsimandresy NN3, 2Randriamalala NC1,5, Rakotonirina FP, Andrianjafinoro TH, Ranjarisoa LN, Ramaroson J1. Factorsinfluencing the choice of oral health care center by the population of Mahajanga I, Madagascar. India.2024 : (07).15-3.
17. Almajed O. ShapingSmiles: A Narrative Review of Crown Advancements in PediatricDentistry. Cureus. London.2024 : (1) :1-7.
18. Neuber T, Setzer FC. Long-termtreatment of a maxillary central incisorwithuncomplicated crown fracture : a case report. Endo (LondEngl). England : 2008 : 247 -56.
19. Jing C, Jiahui L, Chunmei L, Xiaojin g, Xiaoe Zhao, Guangtai Song. Treatmentoutcomes of permanent teethwithuncomplicated and complicated crown fractures and factorsassociatedwithpulpsurvival: A retrospectivestudy.Dentaltraumatology. Willey.China. 2024 : 306-15
20. Tulin T, Pınar SE, Tulin I, Cansu OO, Melek DT. Management of crown fractures withdifferentpulptreatments and Re-attachment technique : case series. BMC Oral Health. Turkey. 2025 : 25 :489.
21. Le Roux O. L’intérêt de la biomimetisme en pratique quotidien. Clinic.Dentoscope. France : 2000.50-6.
22. Marniquet S, Tirlet G. No-post, No-crown.Formes de préparation contemporaines pour les restaurations adhésives. L’information dentaire. France : 2017 : 16-5.
23. P Magne _ J Goldberg _ D Edelhoff, J-F Gu¨ th. Composite ResinCoreBuildupsWith and Without Post for the Restoration of EndodonticallyTreatedMolarsWithoutFerrule. _OperativeDentistry. USA : 2016, 41-1, 64-75.
24. Alleman D, Nejad M, Alleman C. The protocols of biomimeticrestorativedentistry: 2002 to 2017. Inside Dentistry. 2017 ;13(6):64- 73.
25. Drouri S, KaramiM,Benkiran I. Restauration directe de la dent antérieure fracturée : approche biomimétique. RevOdontStomat. Maroc. 2015 ;44:214-32.
26. Escobar LB, Da Silva LP, Monteiro PM. Fracture resistance of fiberreinforced composite restorations : asystematicreview and meta-analysis. Polymer (Basel). Portugal.2023 (18) : 3802.