SOCIAL REPORTING DISCLOSURE AND CORPORATE PERFORMANCE OF MULTINATIONAL FIRMS IN NIGERIA
Abstract
This study analyses social reporting disclosure and corporate performance in the Nigerian bank. The specific objectives contains the relationship between community development costs disclosure and return on asset of multinational firms in Nigeria, and pollution control cost disclosure and earnings per share. Secondary data obtained from Nigeria Stock Exchange for the period 2006-2017 was regressed using the Eview-9 Statistical Software to determine the relationship between the independent and dependent. The first hypothesis showed that there is no significant relationship between community development costs and return on asset. Hypothesis two revealed that the second hypothesis hypothesized that there is no significant relationship between pollution cost control and earning per share. In conclusion, return on asset, earnings per share are all important determinants of social reporting disclosure in Nigeria both in the short run and the long run as these variables have negative effect and thus stimulate corporate performance in Nigeria. While community development costs and pollution cost control have negative impact on Social reporting disclosure in Nigeria as these variables are found to be statistically insignificant in predicting the development of the economy. It is recommended that policymakers should be concerned with community welfare, given that profit after tax is a strong indicator of social reporting disclosure as it is positive and statistically significant; to promote social reporting disclosure in Nigeria through promulgation of laws that will mandate multinationals firms to disclosure social corporate responsibilities; that community development costs should be cubed higher than the pollution cost control in the multinationals budget and multinationals should strengthen project monitoring and evaluation team stabilizing the monetary policy and also corruption should be tackle with all sincerity in antecedent to community welfare.
References
Dowling, J. and J. P Fetter (1975). Organizational legitimacy social values and organizational behavior. Pacific sociological Review; 189(1): 122-136.
Ernst and Ernst. 1972 — 1978. Social Responsibility Disclosure. Survey of Fortune 500 Annual Reports. Ernst and Ernst. Cleveland, OH.
Gray, R. (2001). Accounting for the Environment. London: Sage Publications.
Islam, Mr, Azizul. And Deegan, Craig (2008). Motivations for an organization with a developing country to report social responsibility information. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 21(6): 850 - 874.
Kitzmueller, Markus, Shimshack, J. (2012).Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibly. Journal of economic literature,50: 1.51 - 84.
Mathews, M. R. (1993). Socially responsible accounting. London, Chapman and Hall.
Perks, R.W. 1993. Determinants of corporate social responsibility Disclosure: An application of stakeholder Theory. Accounting Organizations and society 17:575-612.
Shocker, A. and S. Sethi (1974). An approach to incorporating social preference in developing corporate action strategies. California Melville.
Trotman, K.T. 1999. Social Responsibility Disclosures by Australian Companies. The chartered Account and in Australia, March, 24 - 28.
Ullmann, A., A. (2015). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure and economic performance of U.S firms. Academy of Management Review 10 (3):540 - 557.
Woodward, D.G., E. Pam, et al. (1996), Organizational Legitimacy and stakeholder information provision. British Journal of Management 7 (4 & 12).
Zcghal, D.,& S.A, Ahmed.(1990.) Comparison of social Responsibility Information Disclosure Media used by CANADIAN Firms. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. 3(1): 38 53.
Copyright (c) 2024 IJO -International Journal of Business Management ( ISSN 2811-2504 )
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the IJO Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.